Teoy-Script

Rise. Good Morning Honourable Judge.

Opening Statement: I, the prosecution lawyer, hereby accuse Meg Murry (Point at Josh) of going back to Camazotz to save her baby brother, Charles Wallace. She caused the family to worry and was being irresponsible about the feelings of her Daddy. In my case, I will show you, members of the jury, that Meg is really very irresponsible. She should not have went back to Camazotz.

Case:

Ladies and Gentlement, I will accuse of Meg Murry going back to Camazotz to fight IT and save her baby brother//.// // If Meg Murry goes to Camazotz and lose to IT, she will go into the clutches of IT. When her dad goes back to Earth without Meg and Charles, the twins, Dad and Mum will need to suffer from also those unnecessary remarks from people and their neighbours saying that they lost both of their children. Dad and Mum already suffered by the loss of their children, and now they would also have to endure the neighbours remarks-it will be a big emotional blow for them. //

// Now, we all know that Meg Murry was successful in her attempt. But, have you ever thought of the consequences? What if Meg failed? Meg has only one life, like all humans, and going backn //// to save Charles and fight a smart brain? This is a great risk for a 12-year old child! You, the jury, must think in the point of view of Meg and her safety. This is a matter whether she wins IT or she goes into IT’s clutches! She will also be very pitiful in the clutches of IT! She could not do things her own way, cannot think her own way, and her life would be very mandatory. //  // Besides, Meg is very impatient at times. She wants to do things her own way and if she is impatient, she may soon be careless and go into the clutches of IT. She does not think before she does something. For example, when somebody insults her baby brother, she will just put her books down and just start punching the boy. THis shows that Meg does not process information when she does things and her actions are harsh. // // **Objection! Are you saying that Meg did not process any information given to her by the Mrs Ws? She was the one that kept warning Charles from straying. She was also the one that figured out that it was love that she had.** // // It is not that, Defedant. I am just trying to say that Meg does not think before she does anything! If she does not think, she may be careless and go into the clutches. It seems that you, the defendant does not understand what I am trying to talk about. //  // Also, if you read pages 182-190 of the book, you can actually see that Meg caused her family members to worry a lot. //// Thus, Meg was irresponsible and not filial. // // Closing Statement: Ladies and Gentlement, in thew summary of my case, I proven to you that Meg was not only irresponsibe to her family members, but also that she may go into the clutches of IT, so she should not have went back to Camazotz at all. Her status at school would also be lowered. Thus, I have proven to you that Meg was very irresponsible a //// nd not filial. //

__How 2 rebut__

Meg was heavily supported: //(However, take note that both effects are possible, but most of the time when there is support the person does better. So, try not to use it. But you decide. By YEOY.)//
 * Well, because she WAS being supported, she would have EXTRA pressure. An excess of pressure can result in added stress and even a loss of concentration**